Liberal Psychology Is That Of Demons — Falsehood Creates A World Without Standards

The psychology of the social justice warrior is identical to that of a literal demon.

What is a demon? Is it just a fallen angel who likes to drag others into hell out of petty vengeance? Not quite.

Demons, as most people know, are angels that have fallen into sin. We humans have the natures of both animals and angels. Animals are body and soul. Angels are soul and spirit. Humans alone are body, soul, and spirit.

Everything an angel does, it does with its full will. You know how sometimes you know you should do the right thing but you don’t really want to so you do it anyway but some part of you is kind of begrudging in it? Angels and demons don’t do that. They do not have an animal nature, so they do everything with full, singular motivation.

This means that they are either entirely good or entirely evil. Humans, however, are always a mixture of both. Even Hitler had a soft spot for dogs. Josef Mengele, the Nazi scientist who was in charge of experimenting on twins, had an affectionate spot for the children. Once they were freed by the Allies, the children could not believe that Mengele possibly meant them harm.

Demons aren’t like this. This is why Christians never pray for Satan’s repentance. There is no opportunity for repentance. The demon is truly totally depraved. (This is also why Calvinism is wrong, because if humans were totally depraved, we could not repent.)

God is Truth. All truth extends from God. Because the demon is the antithesis of anything good, the demon lives in a world of lies. Everything the demon says or does has an element of falsehood.

The thing about truth, no matter how small, is that it demands a standard, and any standard demands a certain conduct. A world of lies allow you to create any world you want. This is why St John of Kronstadt said, “In Hell there is Democracy; in Heaven there is a Kingdom.” Falsehood allows you to exert your will and do whatever you want.

*****

And this is the social justice warrior. For example, the notion that homosexuality is merely an alternative sexuality and not really different from heterosexuality. This alone is ridiculous, but it doesn’t stop there. The homosexual must do whatever he can to do destroy sexual norms. The homosexual always recruits. He cannot stand watching regular masculine men and feminine women marry, stay monogamous, and produce children. And so he destroys all norms for the sexes, aping the traits of a woman while claiming to love men. Nothing is more painful to watch for the homosexual than traditionalist norms between men and women, which is why alleged conservatives like Milo act so, well, faggy. Homosexuals rarely have any interest in marriage, but they pushed for the right anyway as though it was a fight against slavery.

The feminist, too, hates traditional families. You would think feminists would be about choice. But instead they hate stay-at-home mothers. Why? Because the traditional mother is a painful reminder of what they are supposed to be. When women value family over careers, it sets a standard. It forces the feminist to confront a truth.

A few years back, there was a video of a feminist screaming bloody murder at a men’s rights activist. Why? It’s not like anyone pays attention to the MRA. Why would she care that they exist? Well, it’s because the MRA brings up uncomfortable truths about divorce and our legal system. Whatever flaws the MRAs have [Do they even still exist?], they are correct about many things.

Words are another example of this. Liberals have watered down the word “love” to mean anything. Which means that it means nothing. We’ve all observed the “love wins” and “fuck white people” rhetoric of the left-wing. It isn’t accidental, and it isn’t blind hypocrisy. It’s a core feature.

Liberals also hate beauty standards. They make a point to make to make themselves ugly, because at least they have control over the ugliness. This is also why liberals so often have tattoos and piercings. And they absolutely despise anyone who is beautiful. Just look at the wrath they have for Barbie, an entirely fictional character.

Atheists are liberals because most atheists are bitter that God didn’t give them the perfect hedonist paradise they wanted. You can tell this is their real motivation, because they say things like, “If God exists, why is there war and oppression?” In other words, the world has all the correct conditions for the existence of God except that He doesn’t do what I want. The highest moral of atheistic virtue is reducing suffering — that is, finding happiness. Liberalism promises to allow the atheist to do whatever he wants.

Liberals absolutely despise Trump primarily because he represents objective Truth. You can make the argument that he’s actually manipulative and flip flops, but it’s irrelevant. In the mythos of this political season, Trump is the “tell it like it is” wise fool character. Pointing out that there are a lot of negative consequences to immigration or bringing attention to the crime problem in black communities sets a standard of behavior. It forces America to confront a truth. Every word he speaks is existential torture to liberals. This is why he is the first president to instruct the IRS to quit harassing churches, because Trump understands that pastors can and should speak painful truth that will make his enemies squirm.

Look, folks, politics isn’t a team sport. It’s not a difference in policy opinion. It’s a war over fundamental values rooted in a fundamental difference of how one views humanity, which in turn is rooted in a fundamental difference of how one views the supernatural. You cannot separate religion from politics.

pick-a-future-for-america-make-america-mexico-again-trump

*****

You often hear about calling a demon by its name. The demon doesn’t actually have a name. It’s a schizophrenic creature of complete instability. It adopts a name, perhaps from history, and maybe a persona too. For example, the demon who took the form of the witch in The Conjuring.

You call the demon by its name, and you are forcing it to accept a truth. Or at least, something similar to truth. A very small truth, but a standard all the same. You are forcing some measure of stability onto it. The demon cannot stand this. It is torture.

A couple months ago, I posted something on a Facebook page claiming that the artist who draws the comic Fowl Language looked like a low-T beta male. What I said was pretty mild. Something like fifty liberals dog piled on me. I don’t know where they came from. Maybe someone posted a link on Twitter. A lot of them said it was hilarious or “gold”, so I’m not sure if they were complimenting me or trying to insult me or both. I bantered with them a little but mostly left them alone.

This one woman especially kept harassing me. Finally I looked at her profile. After some close inspection, I discovered that she wasn’t a woman at all. He was a post-op transexual. It was a very convincing presentation, but there were a few tells.

I post on the thread that he is a really a man and not a woman at all, and therefore my prediction about him being a single mother was wrong. He immediately blocks me.

Call the demon by its name and banish it from your midst. The demon cannot stand any truth. The social justice warrior cannot abide by any standard for his life.

*****

This is also why blacks will go into a violent rage when you bring up crime statistics or show how they are grossly hypocritical on the whole nationalism thing. If blacks cannot blame someone else for their problems, then they have to blame themselves, which means they would have to do better.

Why do blacks live in the ghetto? They could spend just a little more money and get a nicer place in the suburbs. Government agencies even facilitate this.

The black person loves living in the ghetto because he can do whatever he wants. He can create his own special hell on earth. There is no standard for behavior in the ghetto. There is no accountability. It is like the carnival island in Pinocchio. Smoke, drink, and be young forever.

Hip hop is a genre that is devoid of standards. What little musicality is all sampled (ie, stolen) from other songs. The bar for a successful record is extremely low. It doesn’t have to be good. It just has to have a rhythm. The lyrics mumble in embarrassing grammar about how great the singer is. You’ll notice that conservative or even moderate whites almost never like hip hop — it’s mostly blacks and white liberals.

Blacks over time

*****

But it is all a trap. You cannot live without being enslaved to a standard. You either submit to the law of God or you submit to the law of your gut.

Consider sexual morality. Christianity teaches that you shouldn’t have sex without marriage. Most people in our society, including those who claim to be Christians, ignore this. We had this whole sexual liberation thing a few decades ago, and it supposedly undid Puritanical oppression.

But is anyone more free? People are slaves to their sex drives. Even within our fallen human world, heartbreak at the rejection or betrayal of someone you were in love with is an emotion we were never supposed to experience. Many people have tried to find happiness in meaningless sex, only to get attached and burned over. Despite all of our sexual liberty, polyamorous relationships are still very rare.

How many people rushed into terrible marriages because the sex was good (or even just convenient)? How many people have stayed in terrible dating relationships because their finances were tied together? We all have a friend that we begged to break up with his psychotic girlfriend. We all know the Christian virgin girl who slept with the bad boy who promised to love her forever and then changed his mind.

Sex is not just two consenting adults. It’s not about whether you wanted it. It has a broader affect on everyone around you. Past, present, and future.

You can’t just have sex without either getting attached or ruining your ability to get attached. Sex isn’t mechanical. Your girlfriend admits that she blew the entire Ohio State football team back when she was in college, and you don’t think, “Well, she’s a consenting adult, and sex is just a bodily function that stimulates nerves, so who am I to judge?”.

Feminists complain that men can have sex as much as they want without being judged, but in real life, those men have destroyed their friendships with other men in order to get laid. Men actually don’t respect other men who can’t control their sex drive, because men don’t respect a lack of self-control. I had a falling out with one of my best friends because he bailed on meeting me for lunch less than half an hour prior without even telling me until I asked, all in order to get laid by his psycho girlfriend he wanted to break up with anyway.

The mantra “bros before hoes” is not a rallying cry of jealous single men — it is a standard for us men to keep ourselves in line. You will lead a happier life in the long term if you follow this in the short term.

*****

The promise of freedom offered by demons and social justice warriors is a false song. Just as liberals claim the moral high ground, I would imagine that demons too believe they are on the right side of history. But it is all a lie, and it will destroy anyone who entertains it. For what does light have in common with darkness?

Treat liberals like you would treat a demon. Do not have friends with the left wing [Do center-left people even still exist?]. Do not trust them with personal things. Even talking about something as harmless as music or movies can agitate them. Let the demons sleep.

If they do harass you, make the sign of the cross, call them by name, and banish them from your midst in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Terms like “biological woman”, “sexual pervert”, “coward”, and “ugly” are their kryptonite. Do not assume you can convert the liberal. It does not matter how much truth you throw at them — they love reveling in lies too much.

Advertisements

Rock n’ Roll Is A White Invention, Not Black

Blacks and their white sycophants claim that blacks invented rock n roll all of a sudden in the course of a few central 1950s years and then whites just swooped in and stole it from them. Rock n roll was so stolen that blacks were no longer allowed to play rock n roll and had to do … something else?

No.

Of course they don’t know anything about the history of the music. They just assume that Chuck Berry invented it and then Elvis stole it, because history is easy that way. Did any angry black activist even buy the new Chuck Berry album last year?

The first rock n roll song is generally considered to have been “Rocket 88” in 1952 by Ike Turner.

That’s a great song, but it’s not really rock n roll. It has a shuffle beat that’s more jazz. It’s blues pop. Chess Records in Chicago was putting out a lot of popularized blues records at the time.

And even if it was rock n roll, it was produced by white man Sam Philips, who opened the Memphis Recording Service (later Sun Records) to records Southern music. So at the minimum rock n roll started off as both a white and black cooperation.

Sam Philips is responsible more than anyone for the invention of American music.

And even if it was entirely a black invention (and it wasn’t), it didn’t have a major cultural impact.

“But the blues was a black thing!”

The blues is three chords and some dissonant notes. It’s too narrow and fits too easily into any genre to give a monopoly to one group for it. Yes, it was a black thing, but notice the lack of blues in Africa. It would have never existed without western music, which at the time was bluegrass, gospel, and proto-pop music like Stephen Foster. So there’s one benefit of slavery.

Two years later in 1954, Elvis Presley recorded “That’s All Right Mama” at Sun Studios.

Blues song, yes, but you’ve never heard a black person play or sing like that. It has a country stumming pattern and a different kind of back beat. It’s also missing the “blue notes” in the solo. This was something unique. Leonard Bernstein said of Elvis,

“Elvis is the greatest cultural force in the twentieth century. He introduced the beat to everything and he changed everything – music, language, clothes, it’s a whole new social revolution – the 60’s comes from it. Because of him a man like me barely knows his musical grammar anymore.”

Plus, it was backed with “Blue Moon of Kentucky”, a bluegrass classic originally by Bill Monroe. That seems pretty white to me.

Rock n Roll was a fusion between blues and country into something new that could be marketed for mass popular appeal. It was accessible in a way that blues, jazz, country, and bluegrass wasn’t. You didn’t have to think about it. You just let it overtake you. It was music for young people, by young people, about young people. (I sound so old writing that sentence.)

I am inclined to say that it hadn’t been for Elvis, rock n roll probably would have happened anyway, but every successful musician of that generation vaguely circling around rock n roll said that it absolutely would not have happened without him. I think that’s far more significant than Ike Turner maybe crossing the finish line first if you count a certain way.

“Elvis didn’t write his own songs!”

At the time, it wasn’t considered important for musicians to write or even play their songs. That didn’t become expected until The Beach Boys and The Beatles.

The appeal in Elvis was his attitude. It was the way he threw himself into the music.

Anyway, a year later in 1955, Chuck Berry released his first hit, “Maybellene”, which was based on the western swing song “Ida Red”. Yes, dear children, Chuck Berry “stole” rock n roll from white country music. Chuck Berry loved country music and adapted it into a black style of playing.

Except it doesn’t matter. You can’t steal music. Put two different races side by side in the same culture, and watch how their music will sound similar. (Jazz began to mix with Latin music fairly early on, but that’s beyond the scope of this article.)

That same year, Little Richard came out with “Tutti Frutti”.

Elvis was a whole year before Little Richard and Chuck Berry. How is it possible that Elvis stole music from Chuck Berry?

What happened to black rock n roll? Simple. It turned into 60s R&B like James Brown, much how white rock n roll turned into less blusey acts like The Beach Boys and Jan and Dean, eventually dropping the “n roll” part of the name and most of the blues element. There’s no conspiracy. It’s just two cultures producing awesome music and feeding off of each other. It’s what makes America great. All that melting pot bullshit, this is it at its best.

And notice the lack of outrage from contemporary black musicians. They didn’t mind at all sharing music. Here’s what some of them had to say:

Chuck Berry:

“Blacks didn’t have the air-waves Elvis had. He delivered what he obtained beautifully.”

“Describe Elvis Presley? He was the greatest who ever was, is or ever will be.”

James Brown:

“I wasn’t just a fan, I was his brother. He said I was good and I said he was good; we never argued about that. Elvis was a hard worker, dedicated, and God loved him. Last time I saw him was at Graceland. We sang Old Blind Barnabus together, a gospel song. I love him and hope to see him in heaven. There’ll never be another like that soul brother.”

Bo Didley:

“If Presley copied me, I don’t care. More power to him. I’m not starving.”

Al Green:

“Elvis had an influence on everybody with his musical approach. He broke the ice for all of us.”

B.B. King:

“I remember Elvis as a young man hanging around the Sun studios. Even then, I knew this kid had a tremendous talent. He was a dynamic young boy. His phraseology, his way of looking at a song, was as unique as Sinatra’s. I was a tremendous fan, and had Elvis lived, there would have been no end to his inventiveness.”

“Elvis, he was unique. And he loved the blues, it was a pity he didn’t do more.”

Little Richard:

“Elvis was God-given, there’s no other explanation. A Messiah comes around every few thousand years, and Elvis was it this time.”

Jackie Wilson:

“A lot of people have accused Elvis of stealing the black man’s music, when in fact, almost every black solo entertainer copied his stage mannerisms from Elvis.”

Literally Hitler. Let’s gin up the reparations machine. Surely there’s no ulterior motive to robbing Southern whites of their culture. It’s just pure, blind justice.

And it’s more than just Elvis. It’s the fusion of various musical elements coming together. Elvis didn’t exist in a vacuum. He said himself that rock n roll was based on gospel music.

Rock n roll music is basically gospel and rhythm and blues, and it sprang from that. And people have been adding to it. Adding instruments to it. Experimenting with it.

As I’ve said before, the Scottish lowlanders got kicked out of Britain for being too rowdy, got bored in Ireland killing off feral Catholics for sport, was run out of Pennsylvania for partying too hard, and then filled up the South and the heartland and invented America.

Give us a thank you. We gave you whiskey, country music, and basically anything that makes America fun or energetic or iconic like NASCAR, WWE, and the cowboy. (Though German writer Karl May gets some credit for idealizing the Old West.) On top of that, we made black music worth listening to.

In Defense Of Millennials: A Generation of Painful Virtue And Adaptability

The streets are filled with whiny, entitled millennials. They spent $100k on a degree in lesbian poetry, and now they expect to have the debt paid off for them by magic. They assume Donald Drumpf is a Russian Nazi and have no respect for the democratic process.

I’m sorry, but where are these people? I don’t see them. They exist on the television as Soros’s rent-a-mob. But I don’t know them in real life. I’ve met more in-real-life millennials who spread frog memes all over the internet than who would dress in black and harass people on their way to work.

First off, I have met almost no one who spent anywhere close to that much on a liberal arts degree. Yes, there are some extreme examples you hear about, but you hear about those for exactly that reason. They are extreme examples.

This blog post was inspired off this article, which was a response to a Salon article claiming that it’s awesome that starving artist types are buying expensive hippie food on food stamps. The article responding to that article is worth reading, but they make the false assumption that these are normative, when they’re not.

Most millennials realize that we were lied to. It’s not a moral sin to avoid college. Very few jobs “just want you to have a college degree in something”. Jobs only pay well if you produce something of value people want to buy.

And yeah, we’re furious about it. But that doesn’t mean we have stomped off in a huff and refused to do anything about it.

Millennials are going to trade school. They are working in factories and warehouses. They start businesses. They work hard to get a management position at whatever franchise retail or restaurant they’re stuck at.

These aren’t the people the media focuses on. They don’t make good cover stories for Time. They aren’t good scapegoats for end-of-society fearmongering.

***

I have met almost no one who starts an idiotic business like Cracker Barrel and then just coasts on that for forty years. Baby boomers grew up in a time when you could get lucky on a bad idea and then do nothing for the rest of your life.

Lazy? Entitled? Never before has a generation been given such a gap between promised opportunities and actual opportunities. Old people assume we are lazy and entitled just because we are mad they lied to us. I constantly meet millennials working two jobs. Milliennials do the brunt of service staff work. So throw us a thank you for cooking your dinner. Maybe actually tip your waitress.

The entitlement is that we want to be able to afford to live. Yes, the half-baked socialism is retarded and embarrassing. But a lot of that stems from just how hard it is to support yourself. And we could have developed marketable skills, but we were told to follow our dreams instead.

And there’s no sympathy from the older generation. They don’t have the humility to admit they were wrong. They don’t want to understand our rage, because it would indict them.

Blame us for moving back in with our parents? Seriously? Family exists to support each other. Old people wanted to retire just so they could waste twenty years collecting seashells in Florida. They don’t love their children and grandchildren. We’re just a status symbol and an inconvenience. What good is family if they won’t help you in difficult times? Isn’t that the exact reason family exists at all?

***

You know another great trend I see in millennials that I see very little of in older generations? A desire to return to the land.

It’s by no means a majority, but I meet more and more millennials who want to buy ten acres and raise goats. Small towns are having a small population boom. Millennials don’t want to live in a big city where everything is a franchise.

Boomers and Gen X swore “I’ll get out of this hick town someday”, and in the process they forfeited an authentic sense of community.

In ten years, fast food as we know it will be over. Millennials reject the high-priced slop of McDonald’s and Subway, instead supporting real food like Five Guys and Firehouse Subs. I have probably met exactly zero people under 30 who have any respect for the Big Mac or the Whopper.

[Though Five Guys is over-rated. Hate me if you want. I would rather go to Applebee’s. Yes, I just said that. No apologies.]

Walmart is hurting in sales and slowly closing stores. Target isn’t doing much better. Corporate bookstores are closing down, and independent bookstores are flourishing.

Millennials want authentic culture. Sometimes that desire produces dress-up culture with the weird lumberjack handlebar mustache thing. But it’s a rarity.

Don’t believe what the radio says — millennials want authentic, rootsy music. I have met several people who learned to play things like accordion or mandolin, which until recently were in danger of becoming as forgotten and archaic as the lute or panpipes. Most (straight white male) millennials prefer either classic rock and country or independent music in the wide marketplace of the internet, but almost no one listens to top 40. (The radio is marketed almost entirely to women.)

And the bad praise pop music at church? They say “it’s what the young people want”, but it’s a lie. Young people want beautiful old hymns rich in doctrine, but they’re told it’s a sin to want anything traditional. Praise pop is for middle aged single mothers who are upset they are too old for youth group. The actual youth want actual adult church, and being denied this is a major reason evangelicalism is hemorrhaging members (which I’ve written about extensively on ROK). You can’t have the much prayed for Third Great Awakening unless your church is worthy of having people trust in and commit to it, and that won’t happen with emotionally manipulative soft rock and motivational speaker as a preacher.

I’m no Catholic, but from everything I’ve been told, young people are demanding the traditional Latin mass so much that even the pope has made a statement trying to get them to settle down. Most millennial Catholics who actually believe in Catholic teaching hate the novus ordo, as far as I can tell. And most (young) protestants converting to the break-off Anglicans want Anglo-Catholic high church liturgy.

One benefit of the death of the economy is also the slow death of liberalism. Liberals hold “a good job” over your head and force you to agree with their politically correct garbage. Many millennials realize they’ll be working a dead end job for the next forty years, and if they lose this low-paying job for saying something racist, then they can easily find another one.

There’s the real reason for the rise in nationalism. You don’t have anything to bribe us with. There’s nothing to lose for being a patriarchal, Jew-hating bigot. (Same reason there are so many white power gangs in prison.)

And of course, as people move back into the country, they move more right-wing. Self-reliance tends to do that. One of the most significant shifts in the 2016 election is that the parties reframed from liberal vs conservative to urban vs rural.

***

If you want to look at a whiny, self-pitying, nihilistically hedonistic generation, look at the gen x. I probably hate the gen x more than any other generation. This is the generation that invented having casual sex behind a Pizza Hut dumpster. At least baby boomers still “made love”.

Don’t tell me millennials are degenerate or don’t want to accomplish anything with their lives. We didn’t prop up fat losers like Kevin Smith. We don’t have an equivalent of Kurt Cobain, nor do we want one.

Most morbidly obese, science-fiction-obsessed, formerly-Catholic-but-now-liberal-atheists I meet are gen x. They are 40 years old. They have a job doing, I don’t know what. I don’t know what old people do for a living. Work in insurance? Probably nothing.

The gen x had some amazing music, but otherwise they didn’t accomplish anything. They just felt sorry for themselves for forty years instead of pick up the pieces and try to create something.

***

The millennials are the hardest working generation in decades. The difference is the gap in opportunity. Old people cherry pick a few extreme examples about someone avoiding a car payment in order to get a tattoo and then claim that’s the average. All the while they lecture us on not being prejudiced.

If you are above 30 and think that millennials are tasteless, intellectually shallow beatniks who demand everything be handed to them and avoid work like, well, like the 1960s generation avoided work, then you should scarf another three Big Macs down your throat. Hopefully you’ll die of early onset diabetes and I won’t have to pay for your Social Security.

Don’t Be A Severus Snape

What I hate most about Harry Potter is the shallow morality. Rowling takes emotionally immature, toxic attitudes and calls them virtues such as loyalty and friendship.

Consider Severus Snape. He’s the weird outcast kid. The goth. The emo. The alt right kid with divorced parents. He’s best friends with the hot popular girl who’s nice to all the loser kids. He falls in love with her, but she’s way out of his league. She friend-zones him for seven years and then marries his bully, the dumb jock.

And then he spends the next twenty years stalking her and yearning for her love. He both bullies her kid and swears to protect him out of love for her.

Move on with you life, guy. You aren’t defined by the crappy things that happened in high school.

That was the worst possible way to end the subplot, and you just know Rowling’s idiot fans thought it was sweet. “Oh, Lily is so perfect. She loves everyone. Even Snape never got over her. It’s a love triangle!”

This teaches kids that the way you feel in high school will and should last forever. Nothing is more pure and sacred than high school love. If someone doesn’t like you back, by no means give up or re-evaluate why she (or he, for the female readers) doesn’t like you.

Snape had no reason to care about Lily. She’s just some dumb blonde bitch from high school. And he had no reason to hate Harry. He’s just your typical dickweed teenager. And Dumbledore had absolutely no business encouraging Snape to protect Harry sheerly out of nostalgia for his best friend from fourth grade.

It also teaches people to take pity on the loser kids. It infantalizes them instead of holds them to a standard. Which, in a circular way, only makes the loser kids even more revolting. I have zero sympathy for Snape.

Junior year of high school, I asked out a girl who told me off very harshly. One of those preacher’s kids with the weird artist haircut and fashion who had this idea that all guys suck by virtue of being guys. I was so upset that for the next several years I almost never asked anyone out. I didn’t know how to. And I was afraid of upsetting them or making them feel awkward.

Looking back, it was horribly pathetic, but if I could come out of that beta male suckiness, then anyone can. So there’s no excuses.

And am I bitter at her? No, of course not. She was fifteen. Teenagers are assholes. No one at that age knows how to handle these kinds of interactions with the opposite sex. Everyone is self-interested in their own way.

And this doesn’t just apply to getting friendzoned. Whatever went wrong in high school, don’t let it define you. Whatever went right in high school, don’t let it define you. The day after graduation, nobody cares who was on the yearbook committee or who won the talent show or who ate alone at lunch. Nobody cares who was the classic “item” couple.

Ladies, if you’re dating a guy who is graduating before you, and if he goes off to a college more than an hour away, he will break up with you after he gets there. It doesn’t matter how perfect you two were. It doesn’t matter that everyone in high school knew you as Kyle&Kaitlyn. He won’t even call — you will get a text message letting you know that it’s over. You’re just the high school kid he slept with.

Senior year of high school, I sat dead last in the trombone section behind the deaf kid. Oh well. Looking back, I only did so badly in band because I was bored with the simplistic music they taught us. I’ve progressed musically since then. I can do amazing jazz improvisation stuff. I can sight-sing acapella choir. What do I care that I was the loser of high school marching band?

I had two girls that year agree to go with to me prom and then back out. I ended out working the fries station at Chickfila that night. Today it’s something I occasionally laugh over.

American Blacks Still Have A Slave Mentality

I’ve had a lot of low-skill jobs, which means I’ve worked with a lot of black people. I also ran plumbing calls in Jackson, Mississippi ghetto apartments one summer. So I am intimately familiar with the black underclass (and have definitely met poor blacks who were genuinely good people).

There are two kinds of black employees: the kiss-ass over-acheiver and the half-ass under-acheiver.

In other words, the house nigger and the field nigger.

Blacks have never given up their slave mentality. They do whatever they are told. Their music tells them to be a sex-obsessed murderous psychopath, so that’s how they live. They see the opportunity for government handouts, so they gladly reach into the bowl without any thought to broader consequences to society, long-term consequences to themselves, or simple shame at not being self-sufficient. And why would they consider that? It’s the master’s job to make those calculations.

If you view blacks as children trying to function in an adult society, their behavior makes a lot more sense. Personally, they always struck me as feral dogs. They travel in packs and prey on fear but will quickly back down if threatened. I NEVER allow blacks to intimidate me, because that only emboldens them.

Corrine Brown was a congresswoman from Jacksonville, Florida for 24 years. She was re-elected for two solid decades. A few years ago in the early Obama years, a viral video came out of her in a Florida Gators bathrobe talking on the floor of the House in deep south black creole about how the Gators were the greatest football team ever.

Last year she went to prison for stealing money from a scholarship fund. She didn’t even bother to launder it.

I understand that once in a while people will vote in a bad politician, but let me reiterate that she was re-elected eleven times. 24 years guiding the most powerful, morally responsible country on earth. Eleven times the dumb colored folk of Jacksonville offered up their best and brightest and forced the rest of the country to take her seriously. They forced America into ideological slavery. And if you dare criticize it, you get a whopping and have to beg for mercy. Just ask Roseanne.

You can tell a lot about a people based on whom they choose for leaders. Slaves shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

Okay, perhaps that’s a bit too far. Disenfranchsing an entire race, including those who try to live as good citizens, would cause a horrible race war at worst and at best just make blacks more whiney. And we should incentivize the Huxtable-types of the race by letting them join polite society. We can’t turn back the clock. Fine.

Can we at least restore the requirement that you have to own property to vote? I would gladly give up my right to vote if it meant eliminating the electorate that would vote for someone like Corrine Brown.

Honesty Is The Greatest Aphrodisiac

Ugh. Do I really want to write a game post?

Yes. Because this is something that I always meant to say on ROK and never got around to it. Mainly because I wasn’t a game writer. So for the sake of completeness, here we go. Back into manosphere mode.

Everywhere a woman goes, especially young women in our society, she is lied to in order to get something out of her, usually sex or money. All of our advertising, all of our fashion, all of our popular culture is designed around this.

Our economy is based upon selling trinkets to young women who are terrible with money. Ugg Boots, iPhones, the ugliest jewelry in the history of mankind. At least half of whatever is for sale at your local mall is marketed towards young women. And when they get too old, they go shop at stores like Forever 21.

Our social heuristic — “follow your dreams” — is feminism glorifying work and delaying childbirth so that women will have more money to spend on trinkets that no one with actual life responsibilities would waste money on.

***

Don’t tell me that men are more rational than women. Men can be perfectly rational until there’s a piece of ass at stake. Suddenly all clear thinking goes out the window. Men will believe and say anything for a chance at getting laid. We will burn all of society down with social justice bullshit just because we think it will get us laid. A manosphere friend of mine wrote dozens of articles about how you should avoid broken women like the plague, only to fall in love with an obvious psychopath who nearly destroyed his life.

And very often, we don’t even do it to get laid. We do it out of a vague sense of virtue signaling. It’s as though we think women have more moral authority than men, and so we will burn our friendships with other men in order to prove to unavailable women that we are supportive of them. I had several close protestant Christian friends who burned their relationship with me over the ongoing post break up drama that my college girlfriend instigated, even though I’m the one who introduced her to them! (This is the Petunia in my ROK article about being morally apathetic.)

Their nice guy morality enabled and encouraged her to rush into marrying the next guy who showed her attention, an off-the-boat Mexican who barely spoke English and was probably twenty IQ points below her (she is actually very intelligent and cultured, at least when I knew her). Based on my Facebook stalking, she never seems happy, there are no pictures of them close, and she embodies the term “frumpy” like a Platonic ideal. But these friends of mine insisted it was true love, as though such a thing can possibly exist without having lived together and suffered each other for several years! They acted as though merely dating was a pure, sacred bond that I had no moral license to interfere in (I was stupidly trying to get her back — the whole experience was a goldmine of life lessons).

(No, I am not bitter. It’s been eight years. We would have been bitterly divorced years ago if we had gotten married. Both of us were devoid of emotional maturity at the time.)

***

We men have become cowards. We have no integrity. Women are just objects to us — whether sexual, financial, or moral. Is it any surprise that they meet our expectations? Women no longer develop individuality or virtue because they are just a means to an end for us men. We do not expect them to act like adults.

Oh, is that too cynical and crass? Does it seem that I am over thinking things? Perhaps even, dare I say, almost agreeing with feminists?

How many times have you been told, “No woman will ever love you with your views.”?

In other words, sell out your beliefs about reality for pussy.

And women know this. They are expert bullshit detectors. They only believe the lies they wish were true.

So when you the man who has enough of his own identity to not care if the world hates you is willing to be blunt and honest with her, she melts. It doesn’t matter what horrible right wing thing you espouse. It doesn’t matter that you tell her to lose some weight. You can straight up tell her that all women are sociopaths (which most women will admit if they’re honest).

She doesn’t care. You’ve hit the right button. You are the only person in the world who is not lying to her for your own gain. She knows she can trust you.

Because she knows she can’t trust herself. She knows she is a child who will let herself be led off a cliff. She wants an anchor who will keep her from self destruction.

I always laugh inside when women claim they have low self esteem, as though that is something unique. ALL women have low self esteem. All women know they cannot trust themselves. That’s why they need you to be trustworthy.

Whenever a man cheats on his wife, she says, “It’s not the sex that bothers me. It’s knowing that my life was a lie.” In most non-Christian cultures, women will tolerate their man cheating on her via polygamy or concubines so long as he doesn’t hide it from her.

***

I always cringe when women make their husbands backtrack on a vague joke about her getting old or something. Stand your ground! Apologizing over a contrived conflict isn’t going to make her respect you, because she already doesn’t respect you. And it waters down the value of any real apology for a real transgression you will have later.

This is the power of the neg. The neg is NOT about lowering her self esteem. Let me say it again, because no one gets this point. You do NOT insult a woman you want to sleep with in order to lower her confidence. If you approach it like that, she’ll see what you are doing and think you are manipulative — ie, the opposite of honest. You’re being just like everyone else.

You mildly criticize a woman you want to sleep with because it shows that you are willing to be honest with her. It doesn’t have to be anything large. Just tell her she should brush her hair or smile more. Whatever. You’ll figure out the right thing to say in the moment.

FB_IMG_1444710027642

Good Southern Christians Don’t Wear Green: The Saint Patrick’s Day Post

Is it too late for a St Patrick’s Day post?

St Patrick sacrificed everything to follow Christ. The American response is to commemorate him by getting black out drunk.

And this is because American St Patrick’s Day is, fundamentally, a Catholic thing, and Catholicism is inherently hedonistic. Just look at Mardi Gras.

Most people think that the Irish flag is three vertical bars of green, white, and orange. But this is not the national flag of the Irish people. It is only the political flag of the Republic of Ireland. The national flag of Ireland is a white field with a red “x”, and it has been incorporated into the Union Jack.

The green represents the Catholics, the orange represents the protestants, and the white represents the hope for peace between them.

In former times when symbols had meaning, orange was the color of the protestants, because of the association with the region in southern France. As you may remember from high school history, there was an English protestant king named William of Orange. The reason your carrots are orange in the supermarket (but white, black and purple at the farmer’s market) is because the Dutch bred them to be orange to express their protestant loyalties.

When you put on the green for St Patrick’s Day, you are announcing your loyalty to the pope and all the blasphemies taught by the Catholic Catechism

“But it’s just a goofy tradition. Does it really matter?”

Yes. Symbols and history have meanings. Symbols may shift their meanings in different contexts, but that doesn’t make them empty. If you put on an upside pentagram with a goat’s head, you know it’s an occult symbol. But people put on the green every March 17th without a thought to where it came from, assuming that Ireland just has really nice grass.

But it gets worse. The protestants in Ireland aren’t actually Irish. They are mostly the descendants of low-country Scottish. (The borderlands aren’t actually flat, but compared to the rest of Scotland they would look like low country.) Some of these Scots-Irish stayed in Ireland, but many came to Pennsylvania and filled up the American interior, especially the South. As for those who stayed in Ireland, this erupted into an on-again-off-again civil war in the 20th century, with the Catholics in the Irish Republican Army (IRA) committing domestic terrorism in Northern Ireland in the latter decades of the century.

For those of us who are good Scottish-descent blood-and-soil “God and guns but not George the Third” Americans, when you wear green on March 17th, you are expressing your solidarity with those who murder your distant cousins.

If you absolutely insist on celebrating St Patrick’s Day, at least wear traffic cone orange instead of just doing whatever society tells you to do. Your ancestors were mowed down by the English in Great Britain, then mowed down by the English in Ireland, then mowed down by the English in the American Revolution, and then mowed down by the English-descent Yankees in the Civil War (plus the various exploitations of coal miners and whiskey distillers). And for some reason you still trust authority?

Serving in the British Army, Captain Johann Henricks, one of the much despised ‘Hessians’, wrote in frustration ‘Call it not an American rebellion, it is nothing more than an Irish-Scotch Presbyterian Rebellion.’ [link]

If someone pinches you for not wearing green, punch him in the throat in the name of John Knox. Have an ounce of integrity for once.

Read More: Armchair Anthropology: The Difference Between Scottish And Irish Culture And Its Effect On America