The Demons In The Woods

In the beginning humanity roamed the steppes searching for bison and berries. In time they built cities, and that which lived outside the city became the Other. The enemy tribe on the other side of the river was easy to understand and plain to see. What was truly terrifying was what couldn’t be understood or seen.

Mythologies about Minotaurs and frost giants ended with Christianity, but in their place rose new mythologies about the witch in the woods with the house of candy who eats children. Or the wealthy elderly widower with a country mansion and a basement full of corpses. What’s in the woods? Goblins and witches and trolls.

But today we are scientific. We know there’s nothing in the woods except lions and tigers and bears. So now we have new demons in the woods.

Klansmen, Nazis, and white supremacists. These creatures don’t exist, but that’s kind of the point. The Klan formally disbanded in 1944. The Nazis are a defunct political party from another continent. White supremacy is a meaningless smear term to stigmatize anyone who thinks the West is least barbaric part of the world.

Nietzsche said that if God didn’t exist then we would have a need to invent him anyway. But what about the opposite of God? Satan and witches and goblins and Sasquatch and Klansmen and registered sex offenders. Those are just as important. You can’t believe in goodness without believing in an evil to fight against. We need Nazis and Klansmen to exist. Where would we be without them? We need the Ku Klux Klan to give us normies the moral high ground.

When Trump beat a candidate that almost literally no one actually wanted for president, people acted as though the demons had finally come out of the woods. Gays would be sent to camps and have all the sparkles electrocuted out of them. Muslims would be forbidden from wearing their self-stigmatizing clothing. Blacks and Mexicans would be hunted for sport by civilian and policeman alike. All the nation’s handicap bathrooms would be permanently closed.

Unfortunately nothing that awesome happened. All that happened was some economic restructuring, and everyone’s unemployment levels went down. Lame.

What the liberal one-percenters in DC and New York don’t realize is, for years Hillary Clinton has been the demon in the woods for middle America. For 20 years people from Georgia to Idaho were terrified she would get elected. Bill would flip flop as needed, but Hillary was a true believer in the far left and would enforce it with an iron fist (or whatever material lesbians’ use for fisting). Somehow the elites thought they could get enough of a coastal majority to ignore the interior’s deepest political fears and this wouldn’t at all cause a horrible backlash like electing Donald Trump or losing the rust belt.

Realistically Hillary wouldn’t have done much as president. She isn’t far left, because she doesn’t have beliefs. All she would have done is flood the country with feral migrants so that a Republican is never elected again, stock the supreme court with liberals, and get us into a suicidal war with Russia, but that’s nothing the Republicans weren’t heading towards themselves.

I think within a hundred years, Hillary Clinton will replace Adolf Hitler as the most evil person who ever lived. Candidates will say the opposition is “the new Hillary Clinton.” People will say things like, “My mother is the worst — she’s like literally the Hillary Clinton,” or, “That girl’s only 15 — I wouldn’t touch her with Hillary Clinton’s dick.”

Eat your vegetables children, or else Hillary Clinton will get you.

What would be really fun for Halloween is get a small group of people to dress up as Klansmen and scare white liberals downtown. What does society possibly fear more? Fake vampire blood won’t get you any mileage. What people really fear is the radical white identitarianism hiding in the woods. It’s time to make Halloween scary again.

Advertisements

Using Language to Describe Gays and Trannies

This article was originally published on Matt Forney’s website. It’s one of my favorite things I’ve ever written.

*****

I remember when the pregnant man came out and was a media sensation in 2007. This man was missing a Y chromosome due to the unfortunate fact that he was born with a Pikachu instead of a Diglett, but that’s beside the point. He said in an interview that he was “secure in [his] masculinity” and didn’t see any way that pregnancy would make him less of a man.

As much as I have adopted the term “secure in my masculinity,” I have bad news. We men don’t do that. If you made a list of the top five things all men have in common, “not shit out children” would be number one. Yes, even “having a penis” would rank lower, since some lose theirs in unfortunate farming accidents. If you’re going to play in the boys’ clubhouse, then you can’t be acting like a girl. After all, you swore to us that girls were nasty, remember?

Of course, one is inclined to call her gay, but the modernist will quickly stop you. “He clearly likes women!”No, he is clearly a she, as evidenced by her ability to sue for child support. Men got the brains and the power, and women got societal pity. That’s the arrangement from the beginning of time. The pregnant trans-man is screwing a comparatively normal woman, and therefore she is gay. Logic and semantics will always trump 20th century Eurocentric liberalism.

And don’t give me this “pronoun-slash-pronoun” nonsense. It’s too wordy. Either call the person by the person’s “cisgender” [snorts like a feminist writer] pronoun, “it,” or avoid pronouns altogether.

Vogue Psychology Shows Our Lack of Education

Another word I hate: “homosexual.” This word is actually very recent, dating to a little more than a hundred years old. The nerdy reader can tell since it is a mix of Latin and Greek roots, once a taboo but now commonly accepted in our modern and amoral world of television, automobiles,and neuroscience (all of those are biracial words). Another sign of our decadence and general stupidity.

Beyond that, the problem with “homosexual” is that it implies there is something compulsory about it. “Oh, my bad. Can’t help getting anal fissures considering I was born this way.” True, you can’t help whom you lust after, but sex is a choice: supposedly most gay marriages are open marriages, but I don’t care to do the field journalism to confirm.

In the old days, there were no laws against sexual orientation. What there were was anti-sodomy laws, meaning that you could hold hands in the park all you want, but keep your dirty thoughts in the confessional booth where they belong.

And don’t think I am merely gay bashing. Manosphere writers talk all the time about how much they enjoy anal with a woman, and it’s fucking disgusting. Do you really want to get shit all over your dick? There is something deeply unnatural about that, no matter how much you enjoy it.

A Better Solution

The word “homosexual” is just not descriptive enough. Really, it is the wrong description. The Latin “sex” refers to anatomy, not the action. So what does “same genitalia” mean? I prefer drinking with men instead of women, so am I a homosexual? No, I’m normal. The better (and racially pure) word would be “homoeroticist,” meaning “lustful desire for the same.” Yes, I stole this straight out of the liberals’ playbook.

See, it sounds like it’s the same thing but carries a special connotation not to be lost, shifting the focus from biology and inclination to desire and action. No longer will we have this “they love just like straight people do!” With this new word, we will put aside the idea that sodomy is anything other than masturbation, and we will not need a dozen different categories like bisexual, transsexual, asexual, pansexual, omnisexual, aequalisexual, unisexual, consexual, and others to describe the same basic aberrancy. Every year they add new letters to the end of “LGBT,” and I’m just not compassionate enough to give a damn about remembering.

We rail against leftists for making up new words and then immediately abusing them like a dog to make a political point, but at least “homophobic” is of a pure racial lineage. Still, “homophobic” leaves something lacking. I do not fear gays, because it’s not like they are going to mug me at gunpoint. Nor do I have a problem with two queers holding hands in the park.

No, what bothers me is that there is not a word to describe hatred of gays. And I do not mean that I hate men deforming their bodies to play make-believe sex, because that’s largely benign to society. I hate the kind of queer who wears neon shoes and makes an effort to raise his voice by a half-octave. They don’t make men like that outside of modern Western society, and it’s the difference between the words “faggot” or “gay” and the word “homosexual.” Hell, the ancient Greeks and Romans didn’t even have a word for someone who has erotic attraction or activities with someone of the same sex, even though Plato’s Symposium is “the” classic work on homoeroticism.

The Way Homoeroticism Actually Works

Furthermore, the concept of sexual orientation or identity is a fairly new phenomenon and specifically of Western origin. Before a little more than a hundred years ago, nobody on the planet had this notion of “I’m attracted to [x] sex.” If a man had any homoerotic inclination, what it was was, “I need a wife to make children, but since women are stupid and crazy, I’d rather bang men unless God tells me not to.” Read Plato’s Symposium [actually, don’t], and you’ll see very few parallels with today’s queer-normative culture.

All Athenian aristocratic men were pedophiles, but you do not find many men today rising in the streets demanding the right to molest children, which would make sense if sexual inclination was a genetic quirk found in all human societies. And while the gays are welcoming to trannies (who have precious little in common), we find them giving pedophiles the boot, even though both just want the right to love whom they want. Every social movement has a mythology, not in the sense of “falseness” but of “teaching a story,” and the idea that people have always been secretly gay and oppressed is as ridiculous as the idea that men have always had it awesome and women were too oppressed to break free.

So don’t use the words “sexual orientation” or “sexual identity,” even if you believe that there is a biological component. I am inclining towards “sexual preference,” but you may prefer “sexual inclination.” Kinsey scale, right? Three-quarters of professed lesbians have had sex with a man before. At any rate, although I will concede that there are likely biological triggers, I seriously doubt it is merely biology for anyone. Social pressure, childhood trauma, and other outside factors could cause one to become curious, like a door that is opened and never can be closed.

It’s About More Than Just the Sex

And again, being homoeroticist in America is not merely about love and sex. These people are fascists, clinging to their own dogma. Consider the way they try to silence any studies showing that their lifestyle is destructive to their children. But even without that, just look at their parades! Why would we allow this in our streets? You can claim that you are a salt-of-the-earth person just like me, or you can claim that you have a unique culture, but you cannot have it both ways (pun intended). At least the feminists give a weak “not all feminists are like that,” but the queers do not even bother. It is like they are trying to give us a reason to hate them. I would hire a salt-of-the-earth-type homoerotic man any day, but the faggot can hit the door and find a bar to dance in.

One thing I have never understood which my gay friends never try to explain to me is what they want and need in a partner. Men like beauty and domesticity and women like status and provision. Both sexes have a special need that can only be met in the other. It’s a beautiful way of the two becoming one, each augmenting the others’ life in a way the one cannot get from his or her self.

So which is the homoeroticist searching for? Whether Christian or atheist, I don’t see how anyone could think that’s a healthy lifestyle physically, mentally or emotionally. I don’t need the Bible or the APA to tell me that; it is pretty manifest as is. And it is no surprise such a presence of homoeroticism arose when the feminists began pushing that traditional sex roles were a mere social construct and should be discarded.

So no, I am not going to use the currently acceptable words, because I do not find them correct. They may fit some people’s vogue worldview, but they do not fit mine, and to quote their own ethical rulebook, “just be yourself.”

Ode To ROK

Roosh announced today that Return of Kings will go on an indefinite hiatus. I understand his reasoning and personally have no room to criticize.

Still this makes me immeasurably sad. ROK was a forum where any heterosexual man to the political right could publish his thoughts and have them out in the marketplace of ideas. Occasionally this led to subpar content, and the comments section was horrendous, but that was part of the price for the greater vision.

Roosh gave a voice to the voiceless. The reason I have any internet presence at all is because of him.

Personally I think the internet censorship is a phase that will pass. Things will get a little worse but then lighten up, either through government intervention or the free market. But that’s just my prediction.

Below are five of my all time favorite ROK articles.

http://www.returnofkings.com/132612/why-i-ate-my-pet-pig-and-you-should-too

http://www.returnofkings.com/25730/4-gender-swapped-fairy-tales-for-the-21st-century

http://www.returnofkings.com/45280/the-most-disgusting-thing-a-slut-can-say

http://www.returnofkings.com/40827/a-brief-lesson-in-game-from-charlie-sheen

http://www.returnofkings.com/30374/a-stop-at-disenchantment-the-social-retreating-of-men

Diversify The Court!

All of our political and social discourse is about ensuring we have proper diversity. Today the media is talking about the lack of diversity when questioning Kavanaugh’s accuser and how it’s all white men asking questions. No surprise there.

You know institution is super elitist and privileged that no one talks about? The Supreme Court itself. Every justice went to Harvard or Yale and is either Jewish or Catholic. Gorsuch is the only maybe protestant. Nobody notices. Nobody explains. Nobody objects. I don’t know why.

I kind of get the ivy league and Jewish thing because I’m racist like that, but what’s with stacking it with Catholics? Is that because Catholicism is more universal? Or they fit mainstream American culture better than, say, a Baptist or Lutheran? I guess Catholicism is less ideological. Like they both support and oppose homosexuality, so maybe they can be more impartial? The last several presidential elections have swung with the Catholic vote, so maybe the Know Nothings were right.

If you went to Emory or Columbia for law school, you won’t be made a Supreme Court justice. Is it because Harvard and Yale are inherently better schools? No of course not. It’s because Harvard and Yale are names. Names matter.

There’s no merit to it, nor is there intended to be. An uneven amount of congressmen went to the ivy league, so it makes sense that they want to preserve their own prestige. A college degree is only as valuable as the the paper that it’s printed on, so locking the rest of America out of the Supreme Court keeps the value of that paper artificially inflated.

(For similar reasons, there used to be a rule in Mississippi that Ole Miss law graduates didn’t have to take the bar exam. When that rule was removed and their graduates kept failing, the state decided to make the test easier. And so today not every lawyer in the state graduates from the same school anymore.)

Meanwhile these people on the Supreme Court make super important decisions that only us normies have to deal with. Like that whole civil rights thing and bussing kids into other school districts and blacks suing whites for being vaguely rude. It’s easy to throw freedom of association into the trash when you live in a gated community and send your kids to private schools. Who cares about the poors? They’re all racist and sexist homophobes anyway. I have like three black friends. No, four if you count the guy at the coffee shop. Why would anyone possibly be so cruel as to want a wall with Mexico?

Academia, like all institutions, exists to perpetuate itself. They say that their peer-reviewed papers and statistical research are true and super important and the gold standard to direct society for the same reason I claim more or less the same for this blog. It’s the same reason Congress will never vote themselves term limits, so quit asking.

If we really want diversity on the Supreme Court, quit hiring (because it’s not like they’re elected and accountable) people based on racial credits who all went to the same schools in the same north-and-east region. Hire a hillbilly from rural Minnesota. Or even a black communist lesbian from Georgia. At least it would be something different.

Wait, none of that applies to any of us. It’s totally out of our control. Papa Trump did the most small-d democratic thing ever about the Court by giving us a list of people whom he would consider.

You want to really effect change and bring fairness and create a blind justice system? Quit voting in senators with dual citizenship. Is that not obvious?

Why Are You Earning Money?

I’m at the age now where I watch my friends rush into terrible marriages. It’s often enough to be a pattern and not just two idiots screaming about how we’re all jealous. The worst part is that there’s nothing I can say to talk them out of it. I know how Paul McCartney felt.

What is the most confusing in it all is when they are dating a woman who claims she doesn’t want kids. What kind of woman doesn’t want kids? Wouldn’t that make you kind of question why she’s such an outlier? This isn’t me being particularly red pill. Almost all children’s toys marketed to girls are based around having kids. Kind of odd that a few grow up to be totally repulsed by it.

What I also can’t understand is the married couples where both spouses have very decent jobs and either have no kids or just stop at one.

The imaginary conversation in my head goes something like this:

Why? Why are you earning money?

To survive.

Well duh, but beyond that. Why do both of you work jobs you at best tolerate when you have more than enough to survive? What are you going to do with that money?

Spend it. And I love my job!

Yes of course, but on what? [And everyone hates their job, so quit lying.]

Whatever we want.

Which is…?

Just the things people need and want…

In other words, they don’t know why they are earning money. They just know that earning money is something adults do and it feels good to spend money on things they like.

Of course there’s nothing wrong with eating out or taking a nice vacation, but I know people who will waste money on updating their kitchen while their grandchildren are in the hospital and their daughter can barely pay the bill.

You think lawyers are happy? All lawyers want to quit their jobs. So do most medical professionals. So why are they working?

There’s a decent chance old Blair is going to stay all alone for the rest of my life (though I would never join a retarded internet movement like MGTOW, because joining movements is kind of the opposite of going your own way).

And if that is the case, you know what I’m not going to do? Try. I’m going to make enough money to have secure employment and pay my bills and stock up for the collapse, and that’s going to be it. I can’t imagine putting in extra hours at a job I hate just so I can spend an hour at a restaurant eating a steak.

Some people criticize me for going to law school, and for good reason, but the only reason I went was to provide for a family. I wasn’t like all the other tards there who were trying to pursue their dreams. Dreams are for children and drug addicts.

If I’m not going to reproduce, I’m going to pull an Aaron Clarey and try to live on $20k a year. Next year I’m going to try to buy a house and some acreage in the country. I don’t care about all the posh restaurants opening up downtown with their craft cocktails. All I need is a Walmart and an Applebee’s.

You Get The Leader You Deserve

Do you know why Bush was such a terrible president? Because we elected him. If we had never elected him, he would not have been such a terrible president. Maybe he would have spent the next eight years making documentaries lying to stupid people.

People complain that the parties offer them up terrible candidates, but they only give us candidates they think will win. You wouldn’t have a Barry Goldwater today. All the liberals daydreaming about a second FDR? It’s not going to happen. The Reagan Revolution? Reagan’s in the grave with the rest of the 80s.

Bush was a the perfect mirror to America. Selectively narrow views of history and geography, a true believer in our moral supremacy, and a passion to evangelize our ideology with the rest of the world. Who better to represent us?

But we didn’t like that. He was an uncomfortable reminder that you can’t have it all. So we backed Obama, the dark horse outsider, who truly did promise we could have it all. Obama told us the lies we wanted to believe. How could he not win? And then everything people hated about Bush, they hated about Obama. Everything just got slightly worse.

Obama was the safe gay best friend of women’s dreams. In the video of the Beach Boys tribute at the Kennedy Center when Obama is giving this huge fake smile and clapping along as though he possibly enjoys this honkiest of all honky music, we see the summation of America. Clap and laugh at what is going on now and just don’t think about it.

The American ethos is best summarized in the Rick and Morty quote, “Nobody exists on purpose. Nobody belongs anywhere. Everybody’s gonna die. Come watch T.V.” People love that quote because it’s what we believe. It’s the new John 3:16.

In the last two years, Obama has spent his post-presidency whining and doing petty, ineffectual activism. But of course. Why wouldn’t he? This is the guy who referred to his only policy with his name and “care”. That’s the American narcissism. Behold my mark upon the world!

And so we elected Trump. Our white nationalist president, who loves Mexican food and says he supports black communities and doesn’t want to overturn gay marriage. That’s our guy.

Yes, of course. He’s another Bush, except he’s looking domestically instead of internationally. (White) America loves black people, but only if black people act like white people. We can’t imagine that black people, gays, or whatever group the Democrats are desperately trying to form into a coalition may not be able to absorb our supreme morals and civilization after all.

Trump is going to fix the economy so that blacks can become good whites. Didn’t he promise that in the next election, 95% of blacks will vote for him? And it’s working. A recent poll said that black approval for Trump is at 36%.

If black people can’t become good white people with extra funk, then that means all the social progressivism of the last century was a waste. The white ego can’t handle that kind of failure. We are going to turn coloreds into good westerners or literally kill ourselves trying.

You could also expand this to women. Women in the workforce turned the daily grind into an human resources hell, but we’re convinced this is only fair instead of a side effect of a resource-excessive country. Women aren’t the same as men. If we continue to refuse to accept that fact, we will destroy our country.

Why does every Republican candidate talk about his support for black people, even though blacks almost never vote for them? They aren’t actually pandering to black people. They are pandering to the whites who need to believe that it’s wrong to vote in their own group’s best interest.

So Republicans pretend they are the party for everyone, hence why they courted the Mexican vote so much. Steve Sailor ran the numbers and found that if the Republicans increased just 3% of the white electorate, they would dominate in elections. While Trump has shifted the party vision towards that direction some, they can’t be overt about it. Why? Because white people think the phrase “white people” is racist. And there’s nothing Trump can do to fix it.

If a Republican candidate said, “My policies aren’t going to appeal to black people, but I don’t care because they won’t actually vote for me,” that would be political suicide even though it wouldn’t make any difference in what he actually does when in office.

For similar reasons, whites vote Democrats because that’s where the blacks are and we all know that blacks must be on the right side of history just by virtue of being the noble victim caste. Just look at the civil rights movement. How could they be wrong? Even Republicans think they are just misguided.

If you want another Eisenhower, it’s not going to happen. This is our future. Bush was the last ugly president. For now on all presidents are going to be good-looking smooth-talkers with predominantly short-term planning.

As old as Trump is, he had a distinctly sexual undertone in his campaign, what with the hands and the bully demeanor and having a kid in grade school. The Democrats quickly made a point to shut up about how the majority of white women voted for him, because they can’t risk losing the woman demographic. All women adore a fascist. We have Biff Tannen for president. Obama’s the guy who takes you out to lunch, but Trump’s the man who takes you to bed.

I’d Like Some Rape Please

I think writers and speakers on the non-mainstream right-wing (or at least the anti-left-wing, since some of these rightfully point out that the left-right spectrum is facile) should generally avoid publically criticizing each other, so I’m not going to perpetuate the stupid drama by naming names.

Recently two of my favorite writers got on a livestream to insult each other for over two hours while barely addressing the actual issues. The one so humiliated the other that I’d compare it to rape, but he kept asking for more. It was like watching Trump and the media. Somehow the other decided that this was his own victory sheerly by having the moral high ground. Again, like Trump and the media.

About halfway through they brought in the other’s ex-girlfriend to talk about her recent rape from a black stranger in her apartment building. So we got to watch this aging drug-addled whore in a Brian Wilson haze talk about how the world has been so bad to her but she doesn’t want to have a victim complex but like just like the world is so bad like so much like and also the other speaker on the show is a total piece of shit who can’t stop lying. Later that day she then appeared on the first one’s podcast to talk more about how she was brutally raped and asked for PayPal donations.

There was significant documentation where, sure, she was probably brutally raped in her own apartment. And she certainly looks like the kind of girl who gets raped, though I can’t imagine how anyone could look into her hangover eyes and decide sticking his dick in her would be a good life decision. Maybe she was embellishing some about the rape, maybe not. It doesn’t really matter.

This is a woman who, on some level in her visibly broken soul, loves that she was raped. Now she has a moral trump card forever. She can shut down any conversation. She will always have the high ground. People will listen. She could probably get a scholarship. The only thing that could ruin this for her is if she met a black rape victim or, worse, a lesbian rape victim.

Rape is terrible and I hate what happened to her. BARRK crimes should get a public hanging. That being said, fuck her. She goes through a horrible life trauma, and then she goes on two podcasts to talk about how terrible it is but she’s trying to not think about it despite recording it for the whole internet and also can you donate to my PayPal?

Some people said the various speakers were exploiting her, but the reality is that she is self-exploiting. And I’m supposed to feel bad? She’s an adult, technically speaking, and it’s solely her choice to have her story exploited. No one forced her on to the show to scream at someone she used to have terrible sex with.

Nothing is more precious to America than her rape victims. Nothing is more sacred to us than those who had the holy sacrament of cum used against them in a blasphemous manner. I think I’ll get some tits installed and find me some rape. I don’t see the downsides.

Being raped looks so enjoyable, women will lie about having had it like middle school boys bragging about feeling up a cheerleader’s boobs. Most women vote Democrat, the party trying to flood the country with brown people from real rape cultures.

Rape erotica is a huge selling literature genre (using the word “literature” as loosely as possible). And you’ll notice the alleged villain is always wealthy, handsome, and poweful — he’s never a syphilitic crack addict sodomizing Bianca in an alley.

The idea that women don’t want to be raped is ludicrous. Deep down every virginal church mouse lusts after being beaten and raped into humiliation. Why it is, there are various theories, but I think more than anything it’s because women have no impulse control and hate themselves. That and because it gives them the right to complain, and there’s nothing women love more than complaining.

When you find me a mythical woman with authentic self-esteem and respect for herself and others, I’ll consider changing my opinion.